I went to the library last week and came home with four books.
Well…I still had four on my desk that I hadn’t read yet. And they’re going to be due soon, so I thought I’d better limit myself. Here’s what came home with me:
I adore the library. One time about a year ago when I was feeling kind of blue and homesick, I went into the library and the librarian remembered my name. She also happens to be the librarian who looks a lot like my Whitehorse friend Carrie-Lynn. Anyway, I cried a little bit. Yes, it was kind of embarrassing to have to wipe my tears at the library check-out desk. But that’s only one reason I love the library.
Mostly I love the library because it’s full of books.
There is one thing that makes me twist my mouth sideways, though and it’s this:
Terry Brooks and Ben Bova do not belong in the same section.
It’s impossibly annoying to sift through all the Fantasy in search of a new SciFi to read. Especially because there’s like 50 Fantasy books for every SciFi one, which is shameful. Even more shameful is the fact that they’re all lumped together on the same shelf.
C’mon! You wouldn’t shelve Phillipa Gregory’s The Other Boleyn Girl in the English History section just because Henry VIII is in it, would you? Of course not!
Now, some people are going to disagree with me, but it’s my blog so I can say what I want. And what I want to say is this:
Fantasy Fiction and Science Fiction are not the same thing. Ben Bova and Terry Brooks do not write the same thing. They are not even similar. The only thing Bova and Brooks have in common is the word Fiction…and both their last names begin with the letter B.
Terry Brooks writes fantasy fiction. The world in a Fantasy novel includes magic swords, elves, epic quests to save the kingdom from the evil druid, like that.
Ben Bova writes science fiction. The world in a SciFi book is built on technology. Maybe theoretical, way-far-out advanced technology-of-the-future, but technology all the same.
Maybe human beings will never advance their technology to the stage where we create cyborgs who take over the earth, but for sure an elf with a magic sword is never going to be the one to save us from them.
Issac Asimov himself said that “science fiction has its groundings in science and is possible, whereas fantasy has no grounding in reality, and so is not possible,” and I’m gonna stand by my man on this one.
No response required. You know where I stand.
5 Replies to “This post is about books (because I can’t think of a better title)”
Eclectic is a good word for your reading habits. =) I loved Isaac Asimov with a love that will never end! The man was genius in so many areas. I think of him as a modern Renaissance man because he turned his hand successfully to SO many things. I never met an Asimov book I didn’t like, and that includes his two-volume autobiography. He was the speaker at my college graduation, and my greatest sadness was that I had to move from the state two months before the actual ceremony and missed my chance to see and hear him in real time. I like fantasy and I like science fiction, but they are definitely not the same genre! I’ll even read futuristic military scifi because … well, you know, ships, space, aliens, like that. =)
I like sci-fi. I like fantasy. They are NOT the same thing!! Tell me how you like the Stephen King book. I haven’t read that one yet!
And I love the Star Wars pic!!!
I just finished reading Of Mice and Men! Hope you enjoy.
I know you don’t need a response, and I don’t have one about the type of books, because I don’t read either type and wouldn’t really know the difference. But, I do want to say that I can’t resist books when I get into a library, which often gets me in trouble because I always bring home so many more than I can actually read within the lending period, and then I get nothing else done because I HAVE TO read those books! Such a chore! LOL. Anyway, I know what you mean when you say ONLY 4 books!
Nope they are NOT the same thing. And I must admit though that I don’t like too much technology mixed in with my faeries! LOL